This he said would make the President go down in history as a hero.
Octogenarian Nwabueze, Professor of Constitutional Law, stated his
while fielding questions from journalists at the Presidential Villa
after leading a group, “The Patriot” on a courtesy visit to Mr. Jonathan
to submit their memorandum for transforming the nation through a
national conference.
“I still believe … that you cannot combine
national transformation with contesting election. The two are so
different, because once you get involved in the elections campaigns you
undermine your authority to lead the nation for national transformation
and I said if I were the President of Nigeria that I would restrict
myself in serving the nation, in transforming this country in creating a
new Nigeria in creating a new society that would be my concern and I
would go down in history as a hero.
“So if Mr President does that
he would become an instant hero to this country, but it is for him to
chose, if I were him, I would choose to become a hero to lead the
country into transformation and abandon the ambition of a second term,
that is what I said and I still stand by it and that is what I would do
if I were the President of the country, but unfortunately, I’m not,” he
said.
He maintained that though the president was eligible to contest, it was his choice to do so.
Though
Mr. Jonathan has not officially declared he would seek a second term in
office in 2015, many of his aides and political associates have already
started campaigns for him. The president had cautioned that it was too
early to start campaigning for an election that is still two years away
and he would prefer to concentrate on delivering on the mandate given
him by Nigerians in 2011.
Nwabueze also urged the president to
support the production of a new constitution that truly derives its
authority directly from the people of Nigeria.
“It is important
that the National Assembly is putting forward that their powers under
Sections 8 and 9 is to alter the constitution; power to alter is not as
important as to power to abolish what you are altering and to replace it
completely. And we said no; this country, we need the people’s
constitution whose source of authority derives directly from the people,
forget about the contents, we will talk about the contents later,
presidential, parliamentary and all that. Though important, but they are
not as important as the source, where does this supreme law derive its
authorities?
“It must be directly from the people and that is the
position of at least 85 per cent of the countries of the word. So we
examined this and we said this a bogey, there is no problem, don’t
confine yourselves to Sections 8 and 9, because the 1999 constitution is
a schedule to Decree 24, if you read Section 1(1) of the Decree there
are all preambles to that Decree and the 1999 constitution that you are
talking about is a schedule to Decree 24.
“Repeal the Decree and
the constitution will disappear and you enact a brand new constitution
which would derive its authorities from the people, that was what was
done in 1963, when we adopted the Republican Constitution to replace the
Independent Constitution.
“That 1960 Constitution was also a
schedule to British Order-In -Council just as the 1999 Constitution is a
schedule to the Decree 24. In 1963, we abolished the schedule under
Section 2 of the Order-in-Council and made a new constitution called the
Republican constitution. That is what we should do now, abolish the
schedule and relieve yourself entirely free to make the people’s
constitution,” he said.
May God bless you sir. This is the only thing said in the last one year that makes sense. The present constitution has failed the nation. Now is the time to go back to the 1963 constitution, and seek a new inspiration for the construcyption of a new Nigeria. The tragedy now is that I don't see Mr President seizing this moment to champion such a noble cause. But this is the only remedy to save the nation. If he fails, then God will raise another.God bless Nigeria.
ReplyDelete